Mutant Chickens: Bird or Dinosaur?

February 20, 2008

At three years old, when most of my peers wanted to be cupcakes and spaceships when they grew up, I wanted to be a Paleontologist. Seemingly similar, but not really, I ended up with a degree in Anthropology instead. Which, is ok. Instead of dinosaur migratory and flocking patterns, I know about human flocking patterns. Trust me, you may not think so, but humans flock.
Anyway, with that said, my so called ‘nerd’ side revealed, (I like to think of it as the interesting, intellectual side myself) I was watching the Discovery Channel the other night, when a special came on about the actuality of recreating Dinosaur DNA. I, of course, was riveted. I hope some other people watched it too. It was so interesting that they better make a follow-up on it. I’ll cover the major points:

  • Number One: soft tissue has been discovered in dinosaur bones, whereas it was previously thought that soft tissue was eradicated a couple of thousand years into the fossilization process.
  • Number Two: Can we in fact, from this soft tissue/complete cells with nuclei discovery piece together the actual DNA strand of dinosaurs and clone them? Answer: not at this time, nor likely ever.
  • Number Three: The most popular theory around is that some dinosaurs in fact evolved into birds for the survival of their race. We can take that theory, look at the DNA chain of modern birds, work back from their genetic makeup and from there re-create the dinosaur.

Pretty interesting stuff. To me, at least. The best part about it, is scientists have been studying modern day chickens for these tests. They have found out some astounding things, that have apparently been in front of our faces since the chicken arrived from it’s egg, (dinosaur egg?) we just haven’t actually studied it until now. It’s in the process of further investigation, but in the embryology lab, it has been discovered that modern chickens in fact have all of the genetic makeup of their forefathers; evolution has just turned the genes off from maturing.

Conclusion being, if the genes are turned back on, chickens can grow sharp teeth, dinosaur tails with up to 16 vertebra, scaly legs with three toed claws, and indeed arms with three fingered clawed hands. Feathers… optional. I wonder if they would still cluck. Keep in mind, this is all embryological at this point.

Wouldn’t it be interesting though, in ten or twenty years, to have a mutant chicken farm? Chickens with long tails, or clawed-hand arms. Funny as the mental image is, going back to the famous Jurassic Park line that in this entry is completely paraphrased ‘everyone is so obsessed with the can we recreate dinosaurs, but have never stopped to think should we?’

Entry Filed under: Other Rants. Tags: , , , , , .

3 Comments Add your own

  • 1. Joan Mathilda Horsefeathers  |  February 23, 2008 at 2:41 pm

    I, too, saw this show. I was in the extended recovery phase of the strange and virulent flu that is stalking about NY this winter…anyhow, I’d been watching alot of TV, but this was really interesting. And it left me with the thought that it might really suck trying to collect eggs from a dinosaur augmented chicken – it would take the “pecky-henny” syndrome to really nightmarish heights! I think I like my hennies poofy with feathers, no arms, and their usual daft, laughable selves. Dealing with normal hen-pecks when collecting eggs are fierce enough thank you!

  • 2. Cathy  |  March 25, 2008 at 10:09 pm

    YOU PEOPLE ARE SICK!!! Just leave those poor chickens alone! I saw that show, but I don’t think they should ressurect dinosaurs!

  • 3. cutlassliz  |  April 9, 2008 at 2:45 am

    Well, my dear Cathy, we may indeed be ’sick’ but as it has been said that man is it’s own worst enemy, and curiosity killed the cat, in the age of nuclear weapons, open warfare over oil, and even still religion, the US economy going down the preverbal shitter, and multiple other atrocities, I think that, “leaving the poor chickens alone” is a bit low on the totem pole. It’s generally good to remember, that knowledge is power, and if evolution is to be better understood it must be studied, and if not study chickens, then what? I remember the last guy who decided to study humans like that. His name was Hitler. Now, there, my dear, was a sikko.

Leave a Comment

Required

Required, hidden

Some HTML allowed:
<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <pre> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

Trackback this post  |  Subscribe to the comments via RSS Feed


Subscribe via…

feedemail

What’s this all about? Who writes this stuff?

Hi. My name is Jess. I am one of nearly a million people that live in Montana. I have freakishly small feet for my height, and I’m terribly afraid of smallpox. Not contracting smallpox so much as the disease itself. Ok, both. I write about many various things, including, but not limited to, building houses (and being bad at it), cooking (and being good at it), living in the boonies, my frightening old man neighbor and my mother. They don’t know each other.

Recent Posts

Top Posts

Categories

Tags

artichokes bacon bighorn sheep cell phones coffee construction consumers Cooking cows dinner dreams driving environment expenses experiment family flannel gardens goals highways hot chocolate johnny appleseed jungle laziness moose nature neighbors Neverending Story nightmares pie politics pork problems propane recipes rules salt sasquatch scotch seeds spring style whistling winter woodstoves

Archives